SIMULATION WITHOUT TRANSPORTER.fsmSIMULATION WITH TRANSPORTER.fsm
Hi community
I have a problem, I've deleted the transporters of my simulation and now shows me an error with the dispatcher but I never conected with the dispatcher, on the other hand I unpinned the option use transport for the output of my queue "ALMACEN"
The first pic shows the normal working of the simulation with transporter
The second pic shows the error when I deleted the transporter
Hi @DaniCor, was one of DaniCor's or Julio R's or Kavika F's answers helpful? If so, please click the "Accept" button at the bottom of the one that best answers your question. Or if you still have questions, add a comment and we'll continue the conversation.
If we haven't heard back from you within 3 business days we'll auto-accept an answer, but you can always comment back to reopen your question.
your last processor "ENVASADO" is trying to use the central port 2 for transport but does not have a second conexion.
You just need to change that 2 int a 1 and the problem should be fixed.
Hi mates
Thanks a lot for the support now it works well but my curiosity now it's. Why the simulation doesn't run since the beggining like the program with transporter(afterwards some time currently the processor make outputs but suddenly from 0 units of output to 600 units. As you can see in the pic
The program with transporter ass you can see in the first question work normal since the beginning according the process time of my procesor
SIMULATION WITH TRANSPORTER.fsm
SIMULATION WITHOUT TRANSPORTERv2.fsm
Best regards!
no entiendo muy bien estos últimos comentarios. Veo que en ambos modelos corren hasta que se procesan todos los items.
Si la pregunta es por qué uno tarda más que el otro, tu modelo está lleno de miles de eventos muy rápidos con muchos items, esto se podría solucionar de forma sencilla con estratégias como eliminar los mansajes del queue inicial y sustituirlos por un source, reducir el número de items en el queue inicial creando solo un consolidado como un item individual que luego se divida en un separator o cualquier otra estratégia que reduzca el número de eventos o el número de items que están en tu modelo simultáneamente sin afectar a las estadísticas de salida.
Saludos
Correcto corren los dos modelos, pero en el modelo con sin transporters, no se ve un flujo normal del processor1, de la nada de cantidad de output 0 aparece output 700, y eso varia los datos de tiempo de funcionamiento. En cambio en el modelo con transporter desde el inicio de la simulación de ve salidas del output del processor linealmente
Gracias por la ayuda
Hey @DaniCor, one reason you're getting "Array Index Out of Bounds" errors on the processor ENVASADO is because it's using center-port connection 2 when there's only 1 center-port connection available.
It seems to work fine after you change ENVASADO to use
current.centerObjects[1]
instead.
16 People are following this question.
FlexSim can help you understand and improve any system or process. Transform your existing data into accurate predictions.
FlexSim is a fully 3D simulation software environment. FlexSim can be used to simulate any process in any industry.
FlexSim®, FlexSim Healthcare™, Problem Solved.®, the FlexSim logo, the FlexSim X-mark, and the FlexSim Healthcare logo with stylized Caduceus mark are trademarks of FlexSim Software Products, Inc. All rights reserved.
