I'm going to set the processor processing time.
I want to read the processing time by referring to the global table instead of inputting the processing time directly to the processor.
How much does FlexSim's calculation time worsen when I refer to a global table like this?
Since we plan to use a large number of objects, we want to keep the deterioration of calculation time small.
Hi anonymous user, was Jason Lightfoot's answer helpful? If so, please click the "Accept" button at the bottom of their answer. Or if you still have questions, add a comment and we'll continue the conversation.
If we haven't heard back from you within 3 business days we'll auto-accept an answer, but you can always unaccept and comment back to reopen your question.
Returning a numeric literal will be faster than looking up a table value. You can test this easily in a script window by running the nodefunction thousands of times and comparing the result.
If you're concerned about speed to could try creating a Map of process times and use that instead, or use a table with an index.
Please tell me more.
Does a "numeric literal" mean double-clicking on a 3D object and entering the process time in its properties?
How do I create "a Map of process times" and "table with an index"?
Are these different from global tables?
A Map can be on a label of an object or it can be a global variable. It can be keyed by anything - so an object, product type or an array that combines the two. In the past I've done this at reset.
15 People are following this question.
© 1993- FlexSim Software Products, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
FlexSim is a fully 3D simulation software environment. FlexSim can be used to simulate any process in any industry.
FlexSim®, FlexSim Healthcare™, Problem Solved.®, the FlexSim logo, the FlexSim X-mark, and the FlexSim Healthcare logo with stylized Caduceus mark are trademarks of FlexSim Software Products, Inc. All rights reserved.
