Multi-Shuttle GTP Picking Logic using runsubflow

Question

question

yuliong asked Nov 6, '24 yuliong commented Nov 7, '24

Multi-Shuttle GTP Picking Logic using runsubflow

hello everyone!

I am trying to build a conveyor model which has 4 Goods-To-Person (GTP) Station as seen in the model attached. The idea behind is that Queue1 will be the source for Totes containing 6 Boxes, and it will flow out to the 4 different Tote_Lifter and then subsequently conveyor lanes. I have planted Decision Point 1 (DP1) as the point where the Operator should be unloading the items 1 by 1 - The number of boxes to be unloaded is decided based on the percentages at the "Run Sub Flow" process (Minimum of 1 and Maximum of 6). The Totes will then go back into the lifter via the lane on the right.

There are some issues with the model and some questions that I would like to get help for as well:

1) I keep getting the error stating that the label "GTP" does not exist, but I believe it was already created at the onset. Do let me know if my understanding is incorrect.

2) Not sure why but the Totes seem to be only coming out of Tote_Lifter1 and Tote_Lifter3, but not Tote_Lifter5 and Tote_Lifter7 which is the intended outcome.

3) The intention is to have all 4 GTP stations working with a DP and the Operator doing the unloading of boxes to a separate Queue (TrolleyGTP1/2/3/4) as shown in the model. As of now, I only have a rough idea of how to do it for the first station. How can I scale the model such that it would apply to all 4 stations?

GTP_Picking.fsm

Would greatly appreciate any help that anyone is able to provide, thank you! (:

Software Version:

FlexSim 24.1.0

label does not exist items in tote gtp operator unloading unload partial items

1730877998977.png (21.7 KiB)

1730878368888.png (27.4 KiB)

gtp-picking.fsm (73.3 KiB)

5 |100000

Attachments: Up to 12 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 23.8 MiB each and 47.7 MiB total.

Answer 1 · 2024-11-06T10:55:49Z

Felix Möhlmann answered Nov 6, '24 yuliong commented Nov 7, '24

1) The label "GTP" exists on the token that creates the tote and boxes and contains an array that holds references to all created boxes. The token that gets created by the Event-Triggered Source does not have this label. "Tote" is known since its assigned though the parameters in the source. You can access the boxes as subnodes of the tote.

"token.Tote.subnodes[N]" (the Nth item inside the tote)
"token.Tote.first" (the first item in the tote)
"token.Tote.last" (the last item in the tote)

2) Queue1 sends the totes to the "First Available" object. Creation interval and processing interval line up thusly, that only the first two processor receive items. You could change the "Send To Port" field to "Round Robin if Available" to send items to all processors in order.

3) The main features to allow for easy scaling are groups or Object Process Flows. You can add all decision points to a group and have the Event-Triggered Source listen for the arrival event on all of them simultaneously. By assiging the event object to a label, you can know which DP triggered the event.

Or you place this logic in an Object Process Flow and link it to each of the DPs. You can then access the DP anywhere in the flow through the keyword "current".

In either case, you'd need to provide a reference to the operator and queue that should be used in some way relative to the DP. A centerport connection is probably the simplest method.

gtp-picking_1.fsm

gtp-picking-1.fsm (72.1 KiB)

· 3

5 |100000

Attachments: Up to 12 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 23.8 MiB each and 47.7 MiB total.

yuliong commented · Nov 07 at 06:28 AM

hi Felix, thank you so much for the explanation and the help, greatly appreciate it! the model flow is what I had been intending for.

for point 1, can I just confirm that since the boxes in the Tote need not actually be identified by the "GTP" label, does it mean I can remove it?

0 ·

Felix Möhlmann yuliong commented · Nov 07 at 06:57 AM

Yes, you can remove that label.

0 ·

yuliong Felix Möhlmann commented · Nov 07 at 07:26 AM

got it, thank you!

0 ·

question