How to Link Process Flow Activities To 3D Processor?

Question

question

Ankur A3 asked Jun 29, '22 Ankur A3 commented Jul 4, '22

How to Link Process Flow Activities To 3D Processor?

Hi Team,

I am building logic using process flow activities. How can I link it to 3D objects for better visualization?

29.06.2022_LinkProcessFlowWith3D.fsm

Thank you!

Software Version:

FlexSim 21.0.10

processflow visualization link

1656485624293.png (65.9 KiB)

29062022-linkprocessflowwith3d.fsm (33.4 KiB)

· 1

5 |100000

Attachments: Up to 12 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 23.8 MiB each and 47.7 MiB total.

Joerg Vogel commented · Jun 29, 2022 at 08:55 AM

Please add a fixed resource processor process flow template to your model. A new 3D library object will occur in 3D library. It is a fixed resource processor more suited for process flow than standard 3D processors.

0 ·

Answer 1 · 2022-07-03T02:46:06Z

Jeanette F answered Jul 3, '22 Ankur A3 commented Jul 4, '22

Hello @Ankur A3,

I have two solutions for you. The first is the one @Joerg Vogel mentioned with using a object process flow. The second is to use a multiprocessor.

To create the first option, I placed a basic FR in the model and changed its visual to a processor.

Then I created an object process flow similar to the basic processor object process flow. A convenience of this method is that you can set the states for each step.

I added the processors to the instanced process flow.

The other method of using the multi processor is simple. You just add the different processes and their time.

29062022-linkprocessflowwith3d_1.fsm

29062022-linkprocessflowwith3d-1.fsm (54.4 KiB)

1656816074913.png (7.8 KiB)

1656816122414.png (36.6 KiB)

1656816187155.png (49.1 KiB)

1656816164301.png (23.8 KiB)

1656816284845.png (96.5 KiB)

1656815901922.png (13.0 KiB)

· 1

5 |100000

Attachments: Up to 12 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 23.8 MiB each and 47.7 MiB total.

Ankur A3 commented · Jul 04, 2022 at 01:06 PM

Hi @Jeanette F,

Thanks for sharing both the approaches with good explanation.

I appreciate your to the point support.

0 ·

question