question

Ilham avatar image
0 Likes"
Ilham asked Ilham commented

AGV Process flow

Hello, Good evening.
can someone help me to solve this problem.
i already make the simulation of AGV to take box from source and put in input of processor.
and after finish, the agv will take from output and put in the queue 1(Finish Box).
but some case the AGV will put the finish box to input other input processor, not to finish queue.

what should i do.

0517.fsm

FlexSim 19.0.0
flexsim 19.0.0agvpathagv process flow
0517.fsm (156.4 KiB)
5 |100000

Up to 12 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 23.8 MiB each and 47.7 MiB total.

1 Answer

Eric M avatar image
0 Likes"
Eric M answered Ilham commented

Hi @Ilham S2, if I'm understanding correctly, you just want to send items that are finished processing to Queue1, correct? It looks like the destination label on the item is never updated which is why many boxes aren't transported to Queue1 when they finish processing. You can update this by clicking on the queues that you want to send send items to Queue1 and changing their destination to Model.find("Queue1").


1621264605704.png (12.5 KiB)
· 3
5 |100000

Up to 12 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 23.8 MiB each and 47.7 MiB total.

Ilham avatar image Ilham commented ·

thank you very much sir,
can you help me one problem again.

why the first agv immediately put the box in queue 1, and did not process it first in the processor?
and the second process still running normally.
just first agv in first process.

0 Likes 0 ·
Eric M avatar image Eric M Ilham commented ·
Queue1 is currently pulling from the ItemList1 which is what all the other processor Queues are also pulling from. I would create a new list called "finisheditems" or something that Queue1 pulls from. Then change what I originally answered above to use that new list instead. You could also put the destination back to the default if you wanted since only Queue1 is pulling from that list anyway.
0 Likes 0 ·
Ilham avatar image Ilham commented ·

thank you very much sir


0 Likes 0 ·