Stop and resume problem

Question

question

shanice.c asked Feb 17 2022 at 7:46 AM Felix Möhlmann commented Feb 21 2022 at 9:44 AM

Stop and resume problem

Hello, I'm using Stop and Resume in process flow. It shows the ResumeID should match the StopID.

I deliberately wrote 8 in Resume ID field, but the StopID I used earlier is 1. It seems token is still released even if the Stop and resume ID is not the same.

Another problem is that is it permitted to use 2 Stop activities and use identical StopID? In my model I use 2 Stop activities with identical StopID==1, I would like to know if there's possibilty that tokenA been resumed by another token, because they use same resumeID?

STOP AND RESUME.fsm

Software Version:

FlexSim 21.2.0

stop stop and resume

1645083504209.png (155.6 KiB)

stop-and-resume.fsm (47.5 KiB)

______

Cookie preferences

Your privacy is important to us and so is an optimal experience. To help us customize information and build applications, we collect data about your use of this site.

May we collect and use your data?

Learn more about the Third Party Services we use and our Privacy Statement.

Strictly necessary – required for our site to work and to provide services to you

These cookies allow us to record your preferences or login information, respond to your requests or fulfill items in your shopping cart.

YES

Improve your experience – allows us to show you what is relevant to you

These cookies enable us to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we use to deliver information and experiences tailored to you. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not be available for you.

YES

NO

Customize your advertising – permits us to offer targeted advertising to you

These cookies collect data about you based on your activities and interests in order to show you relevant ads and to track effectiveness. By collecting this data, the ads you see will be more tailored to your interests. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

YES

NO

Are you sure you want a less customized experience?

We can access your data only if you select "yes" for the categories on the previous screen. This lets us tailor our marketing so that it's more relevant for you. You can change your settings at any time by visiting our privacy statement

Your experience. Your choice.

We care about your privacy. The data we collect helps us understand how you use our products, what information you might be interested in, and what we can improve to make your engagement with Autodesk more rewarding.

May we collect and use your data to tailor your experience?

Explore the benefits of a customized experience by managing your privacy settings for this site or visit our Privacy Statement to learn more about your options.

Answer 1 · 2022-02-17T10:35:24Z

Jason Lightfoot answered Feb 17 2022 at 10:35 AM Felix Möhlmann commented Feb 21 2022 at 9:44 AM

This looks like a bug, however, since the ID is optional and is used for matching the states when multiple resumptions need resolving to states - it's doing what is expected. If you need to match ids strictly then you'd probably be better creating a process flow to handle the stops.

Note - instead of stop and resume you could give the TE a delay task to do the same thing.

No, the resume method only applied to the object you're resuming - the id can be the same across multiple objects (if it was working correctly).

(I assume you mean the operators are released incorrectly - in the question you refer to the 'token').

· 4

shanice.c commented · Feb 18 2022 at 3:22 AM

Hi @Jason Lightfoot Because I'd like to use stop and resume to prevent more than 1 AGV come into an area that only allowed one agv, the other one should wait somewhere outside the area until been resumed, so in this case the delay activity maybe is not that suitable.

Previously I have tried using an object process flow to control a CP object, whenever agv onArrival this CP, AGV should stop and do some Decide activities. But AGVs in model also was controlled by another "Object process flow"( in this flow, the instance is AGVs).

In this model, I failed to stop AGV at the CP (I want AGV stop), it seems that AGV mainly is controlled by it's Object process flow first, so AGVs are is going through processes like "Travel" activity, even if AGV has somewhere should stop before arrive at it's destination.

Maybe it's because these 2 process flows has no connection? I understand AGV could only listen to a navigator, but I think above case also listen to a navigator. But CP process flow would need higher priority to do what I want.

Do you have any suggestion? I always have problem with "traffic control" problem while defining custom AGV process flow logic, rather than use FlexSim internal AGV process flow template.

Or are there examples which is more complicated in agv process flow that I could refer to? I really like to know more methods that could build flexible and customized AGV logic in Flexsim. Thank you!

0 ·

Felix Möhlmann shanice.c commented · Feb 18 2022 at 9:10 AM

Have you tried to use the AGV "Control Area" to have AGVs stop at occupied zones? They act like an extended control point that can encompass sections of multiple paths instead of just a single section of one path.

ControlArea.fsm

0 ·

controlarea.fsm (32.6 KiB)

shanice.c Felix Möhlmann commented · Feb 19 2022 at 6:47 AM

Hello @Felix Möhlmann Yes, I have tried to use ControlArea in my previous model, because that model was made private, I build the attached model to show my problem. The path is bidirectional and the rack is more than 1 layer. There are deadlock problem when both agv go to same bay(Queue1 and Queue2 in a bay; Queue3 and Queue4 in a bay), and also when both agv are acquiring in the red circle area from different direction.

The second picture is from my previous private problem in this forum, the solution then was put a lot more Control Areas, this did work for the layout in that model. But I feel like putting many ControlAreas sometimes could still deadlock, for example, if the area only allow one is big(let's call this ControlArea "CA"), the other agvs still may have very high possibility to acquire CA from another side of this CA. In this kind of situation, deadlock also happens.

Previously I have tried to trigger agv stop (to do some check)and resume on Arrival the control point circled in above picture, I feel it's a kind of hard to write conditions to resume agv in waypoints( Especially when an AGV checks other AGVs status, location, tasks...). I also tried to create an object process flow(the instance is that red circled controlpoint outside control area), but this seems not work, because i want to stop agv, but agv listen to it's own navigator.

TrafficProblemExample.fsm

0 ·

1645251915938.png (52.0 KiB)

Show more comments

question