question

Jose_antonio Ie avatar image
0 Likes"
Jose_antonio Ie asked Jason Lightfoot edited

Doubts about rack properties

Hello eveyone,

I have a rack with the following properties:2022-06-20-12h21-38.png

My doubt is, non-storables slots are considered 700mm high or should be 1400mm?

If they're only 700mm, is there any way to build a rack with both 700mm and 1400mm level high?

Thanks in advance for your support.

FlexSim 22.1.2
racks
5 |100000

Up to 12 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 23.8 MiB each and 47.7 MiB total.

1 Answer

Jason Lightfoot avatar image
1 Like"
Jason Lightfoot answered Jason Lightfoot edited

Just just drag and select the cells you want to change and then type the level value for that subset.

· 4
5 |100000

Up to 12 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 23.8 MiB each and 47.7 MiB total.

Jose_antonio Ie avatar image Jose_antonio Ie commented ·

1655723007483.png

This picture matches with the rack properties in the previous post.

Since level 2 is non-storable in this picture level 1 should be 1400mm high, right?


0 Likes 0 ·
1655723007483.png (71.1 KiB)
Jason Lightfoot avatar image Jason Lightfoot ♦♦ Jose_antonio Ie commented ·

I don't fully understand what you're now asking.


Marking a location as non-storable prevents it from being considered when you're finding slots by checking the value of the slot attribute 'isStorable' or the hasSpace() method. hasSpace() will return 0 for a non-storable slot.

So an item that is 1.4m tall should not fit in a 0.7m tall level. The problem in making this work with packed items is that only the container is considered by default. Attached is an example which uses the content of the pallet to determine if it has space (in the rack slot assignment code).

StorageOfPalletsWithContents.fsm

1 Like 1 ·
Jose_antonio Ie avatar image Jose_antonio Ie commented ·

Understood,

Thanks.

0 Likes 0 ·
Jason Lightfoot avatar image Jason Lightfoot ♦♦ Jose_antonio Ie commented ·
I updated my post with an example.
0 Likes 0 ·