Label from Different Object Flow

Question

question

ged0313 asked Aug 06 2023 at 5:10 PM Jason Lightfoot commented Aug 14 2023 at 12:30 PM

Label from Different Object Flow

Hello,

I've encounter some problem when using label from another object flow. My process flow is that I register the information of destination and groupname information on the processor object flow and make sure to put it back to list. As I try to use it in the AGV process flow to pull from the same list I found some problem to use the label. That it cannot find the destination of the label I set. I've tried several ways to mention the label, but it come up with the same problem. I'm wondering is there any setting that I missed. The attachment is the model I have problem with, thank you so much for any of suggestions!

my model: label problem.fsm

Software Version:

FlexSim 23.0.9

label object flow

label-problem.fsm (85.3 KiB)

· 1

______

Cookie preferences

Your privacy is important to us and so is an optimal experience. To help us customize information and build applications, we collect data about your use of this site.

May we collect and use your data?

Learn more about the Third Party Services we use and our Privacy Statement.

Strictly necessary – required for our site to work and to provide services to you

These cookies allow us to record your preferences or login information, respond to your requests or fulfill items in your shopping cart.

YES

Improve your experience – allows us to show you what is relevant to you

These cookies enable us to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we use to deliver information and experiences tailored to you. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not be available for you.

YES

NO

Customize your advertising – permits us to offer targeted advertising to you

These cookies collect data about you based on your activities and interests in order to show you relevant ads and to track effectiveness. By collecting this data, the ads you see will be more tailored to your interests. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

YES

NO

Are you sure you want a less customized experience?

We can access your data only if you select "yes" for the categories on the previous screen. This lets us tailor our marketing so that it's more relevant for you. You can change your settings at any time by visiting our privacy statement

Your experience. Your choice.

We care about your privacy. The data we collect helps us understand how you use our products, what information you might be interested in, and what we can improve to make your engagement with Autodesk more rewarding.

May we collect and use your data to tailor your experience?

Explore the benefits of a customized experience by managing your privacy settings for this site or visit our Privacy Statement to learn more about your options.

Answer 1 · 2023-08-06T17:16:55Z

Jason Lightfoot answered Aug 06 2023 at 5:16 PM ged0313 commented Aug 09 2023 at 4:00 AM

First of all your 'Load' processes need a reference of where to load from and the text "Item Container" appears to have been copy/pasted - which is not correct - that option needs to be selected from the list of options for that field.

Then your 'move to processors' activity is trying to find a reference destination on token.item1 which is an array of two items. In this case you will need to choose one of them eg.

token.item1[1].destination.

· 4

ged0313 commented · Aug 06 2023 at 6:10 PM

Thank you so much! It is really helpful. After I fix this problem, I also find some problem with the split. I notice that only the first column of process flow is working. I've check the tutorial that the action of split will allow these activity to implement simultaneously. I am wondering if there is default setting that will first implement the left most process flow. Thank you!label problem.fsm

0 ·

label-problem.fsm (84.2 KiB)

Jason Lightfoot ♦♦ ged0313 commented · Aug 06 2023 at 7:06 PM

I'd recommend either putting more labels so you can check what this evaluates to at a glance:

token.item2.up.as(Object).outObjects[1].subnodes.length > 0

Or debug the code by placing breakpoints therein and looking at the local variables and watch expressions (you add these to test 'phrases') .

Again you're trying to reference item1.up but token.item1 is an array of two items.

0 ·

ged0313 Jason Lightfoot ♦♦ commented · Aug 06 2023 at 11:56 PM

Thank you so much! But after I did some review to the model. I found that for the destination, I have already set the label as:

current.inObjects[1].

I am wondering if it is also needed to set the location of item again as you mentioned:

token.item1[1].destination

I did some changes according to your advice. But I found that it still cannot get the label properly. After the model run for a while. It'll come up with the label does not exist error. But I'm not sure how I can solve this problem><

Thanks for your patience!

My model: 0807_small_autosave.fsm

0 ·

0807-small-autosave.fsm (92.3 KiB)

Show more comments

question