State tracking with object labels

Question

question

Maryam H2 asked Feb 27 2024 at 3:18 PM Maryam H2 commented Mar 02 2024 at 9:33 PM

State tracking with object labels

as you mentioned in this post: https://answers.flexsim.com/content/kbentry/158947/utilization-vs-time-statistics-collector.html the state is tracked via the "On Entry" and "On Exit" triggers. I'm looking to change this setup by incorporating object labels, enabling the state chart to display the "busy" state segmented by each object's label on the floor storage. I mean, I want to create a pie chart that shows the busy state of aggregated floor storage broken down by type of the objects that have been in them. How should I update these triggers below then?

// On Entry
current.setState(STATE_BUSY, 0);

// On Exit
if(current.subnodes.length == 1)
{
    current.setState(STATE_IDLE, 0);
}

Software Version:

FlexSim 24.0.1

states utilization busy state by label

______

Cookie preferences

Your privacy is important to us and so is an optimal experience. To help us customize information and build applications, we collect data about your use of this site.

May we collect and use your data?

Learn more about the Third Party Services we use and our Privacy Statement.

Strictly necessary – required for our site to work and to provide services to you

These cookies allow us to record your preferences or login information, respond to your requests or fulfill items in your shopping cart.

YES

Improve your experience – allows us to show you what is relevant to you

These cookies enable us to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we use to deliver information and experiences tailored to you. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not be available for you.

YES

NO

Customize your advertising – permits us to offer targeted advertising to you

These cookies collect data about you based on your activities and interests in order to show you relevant ads and to track effectiveness. By collecting this data, the ads you see will be more tailored to your interests. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

YES

NO

Are you sure you want a less customized experience?

We can access your data only if you select "yes" for the categories on the previous screen. This lets us tailor our marketing so that it's more relevant for you. You can change your settings at any time by visiting our privacy statement

Your experience. Your choice.

We care about your privacy. The data we collect helps us understand how you use our products, what information you might be interested in, and what we can improve to make your engagement with Autodesk more rewarding.

May we collect and use your data to tailor your experience?

Explore the benefits of a customized experience by managing your privacy settings for this site or visit our Privacy Statement to learn more about your options.

Answer 1 · 2024-02-27T17:07:09Z

Felix Möhlmann answered Feb 27 2024 at 5:07 PM Maryam H2 commented Mar 02 2024 at 9:33 PM

First off, I'd like to reiterate that a Content vs Time chart (or "Wip by Type" line chart as it is called in the dashboard library) would be a straightforward solution to this.

To use the Utilization vs. Time collector for this you'd need to add a separate state profile to the storage for each type. In the triggers each type then only influences their respective profile. There should be multiple posts on how to add state profiles to objects on this forum. The 'best' solution I think is still to just copy it from the multiprocessor and then customize it to your liking.

Lastly, you would then need to adjust the Statistics Collector itself to work with multiple profiles per object.

utilization-vs-time-collector-24-0-fm-multiprofile.fsm

utilization-vs-time-collector-24-0-fm-multiprofile.fsm (46.1 KiB)

· 5

Maryam H2 commented · Feb 27 2024 at 6:10 PM

@Felix Möhlmann

I understand that creating a content versus time or WIP chart might seem straightforward in this situation, yet it doesn't fully address the question I have in mind. I'm interested in getting the percentage of time each piece of equipment is utilized during a certain time frame (for example, "On Monday, the processor was busy 67% of the time, aggregated"). Even the time plot included in the model you provided does not give this information in an easily interpretable way. While the chart shows fluctuations, I'm looking into to get the aggregated value of this so then I have two queries that would be great if you help me with them:

1 - Is it possible to convert the content versus time or WIP chart into a pie chart? This way, instead of interpreting the fluctuating data, I could directly see the aggregated percentage of time the equipment was busy.

2 - How can I create a pie chart instead of time plot in the model attached?

utilization-vs-time-collector-24-0-fm (1)_autosave.fsm

0 ·

utilization-vs-time-collector-24-0-fm-1-autosave.fsm (83.0 KiB)

Felix Möhlmann Maryam H2 commented · Feb 27 2024 at 7:49 PM

1. Content can be shown as a pie chart as a snapshot of the current information. Over a timeframe only the average would make sense to show that way, though that is not what you want if I understand you correctly.

2. To show the data as pies (or bars) you only need to add two things: A column by which to split the data by (this could just be the time, but using a date string might be easier to read). And a second column that is the idle percentage, so that utilized time + idle time sum to 100%.

utilization-vs-time-collector-24-0-fm-byDay.fsm

Is this what you are after?

0 ·

utilization-vs-time-collector-24-0-fm-byday.fsm (84.3 KiB)

Maryam H2 Felix Möhlmann commented · Mar 01 2024 at 3:31 PM

got it. I want to create both a pie chart and a Gantt chart for a multi-profile processor, similar to what you've done before. The pie chart should aggregate and display the number of days each item type utilizes the processor, showing the runtime utilization for Item Type 1, Item Type 2, and so on. The Gantt chart also reflects the same data, highlighting utilization over time for each item type. I got some issues while attempting to replicate this in the attached model and would appreciate if you couls take a look into that. I just wantto make that pie chart aggregated broken down by label and make the gantt chart to show the item types.

Also ist possible to just cjange the processor with a floor storage after modifying the charts, along with creating On Entry, On Exit, and TypeContent Label. my goal is to monitor the aggregated utilization of floor storages, which take items labeled differently and act similarly to processors. I opted for floor storages primarily for the visibility they offer for items, but I can change that to other objects if it's easier.

utilization-vs-time-collector-24-0-fm multiprofile-piegantt_chart.fsm

0 ·

utilization-vs-time-collector-24-0-fm-multiprofile.fsm (84.3 KiB)

Show more comments

question