How to avoid colision in cranes?

Question

question

Julio R asked Jun 14, '17 Jason Lightfoot commented May 24, '23

How to avoid colision in cranes?

I have a problem with cranes that only move in one axis inside a pathway, but cannot overlap in the model. I tried using the collision module inside the cranes but I haven’t been successful.

I don’t mind if this is achieved by agv or any other mean of transportation, but it must be two in the same pathway and not crossing each other or getting on top of one another.

The origins and destinations are crossed, and restricting these for the transports is not an option (eliminating crossed flows)

I attach my model, that is not working properly right now.

Thank you,

Software Version:

Choose One

crane movement paths collisions

gruas-colisiones.fsm (22.5 KiB)

· 2

Joerg Vogel commented · Jun 14, 2017 at 06:30 AM

Can you explain how the crane should behave, if there is happening a collision? Maybe you have to define areas which a crane allocates and then send the other crane to another area or dispatch to the second crane a transport task that doesn't interfere with the first crane.

0 ·

Julio R commented · Jun 14, 2017 at 05:16 PM

@Jörg Vogel It´s having collisions because of crossed paths, but I want these paths to be croosed and the two cranes not crossing each other. What I was thinking was more a scenario where one crane kind of pushes the other until it reaches its destination if necessary. I´ll send another model where there are more chances of collisions.

pregunta.fsm

Thank you!

0 ·

pregunta.fsm (24.1 KiB)

Answer 1 · 2017-06-15T15:09:43Z

anthony.johnson answered Jun 15, '17 Jason Lightfoot commented May 24, '23

Here are my suggestions:

1. Take the cranes off the network. The crane collision logic pick option uses crane offset travel, which does not use travel networks, and travel networks actually get in the way.

2. Set all accelerations/decelerations to 0 on the crane. This will allow the cranes to get out of each others way in proper time.

3. Increase the lift radius on the cranes to a very large value. This makes it so the cranes will never have to take time to lift, i.e. they will immediately travel horizontally when they need to get out of each others way.

Admittedly the crane collision pick option is somewhat simplistic, but given those changes it does work. For a more complex scenario I would suggest using process flow to handle it (we hope to someday make a process flow template for crane collision avoidance). You could have a resource whose "resources" are an array of numbers, each number representing a location range in the model. The cranes would get tasks and then allocate the numbers associated with getting to the location. Then there would need to be some logic for getting out of the way when you can't allocate what you need. It would definitely be more complicated to implement, but if that is the requirement, process flow would likely be the way to go.

collisionavoidingcranes.fsm

collisionavoidingcranes.fsm (21.6 KiB)

· 11

Julio R commented · Jun 15, 2017 at 03:45 PM

Thank you @anthony.johnson,

The problem with that solution is I have my origins and my destinations opposed in the layout, I´ve been trying to use agv too, but I need they only move only in an axis. I first though of cranes because I saw a similar answer here, but maybe AGVs is the way to go.

This is a more realistic model of what I need, but without collisions and the task executers crossing each other:

example21.fsm

0 ·

example21.fsm (27.9 KiB)

anthony.johnson ♦♦ Julio R commented · Jun 16, 2017 at 04:27 PM

Again, I'd say don't use a travel network, either AGV or regular travel network. Those just complicate the issue because they have their own allocation schemes that might interfere with what you are trying to do. Another option is to use the asrsvehicle object. The asrs vehicle only travels on one axis. I've attached a model that uses the asrsvehicle object with the crane collision logic. collisionavoidingcranes.fsm

3 ·

collisionavoidingcranes.fsm (28.7 KiB)

Julio R anthony.johnson ♦♦ commented · Jun 16, 2017 at 06:43 PM

Thanks a lot!!, that's exactly what I was looking for. I think now I understand the avoid collision option much better

0 ·

Show more comments

BargainMan commented · May 24, 2023 at 09:35 AM

Hey,bro,i want to know if u don't use Agent Systems .So how did you achieve collision avoidance for cranes.I downloaded your model and couldn't find a way to implement this idea. Can you help me solve it? Thank you and look forward to your reply.

0 ·

Jason Lightfoot ♦ BargainMan commented · May 24, 2023 at 01:17 PM

If you use a process flow to implement the system Anthony described then it's probably easiest to push movement jobs to a list like the AGV templates use, and then construct the movement tasks from each pulled job and book linear ranges.

1 ·

Joerg Vogel BargainMan commented · May 24, 2023 at 11:50 AM

n agent system is a newer feature not available then!

0 ·

question