Problem with Job shop model

Question

question

Paúl Alejandro R asked May 19 2018 at 3:30 PM Jason Lightfoot commented May 21 2018 at 7:46 PM

Problem with Job shop model

job-shop-example.fsmI am working with a List Job Shop model, and it works pretty good, but I can not understand why some items which have in their job list the step M do not go through this step before go to step Finish.

Please, any explanation is welcome

Software Version:

Choose One

lists routing logic

job-shop-example.fsm (26.9 KiB)

______

Cookie preferences

Your privacy is important to us and so is an optimal experience. To help us customize information and build applications, we collect data about your use of this site.

May we collect and use your data?

Learn more about the Third Party Services we use and our Privacy Statement.

Strictly necessary – required for our site to work and to provide services to you

These cookies allow us to record your preferences or login information, respond to your requests or fulfill items in your shopping cart.

YES

Improve your experience – allows us to show you what is relevant to you

These cookies enable us to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we use to deliver information and experiences tailored to you. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not be available for you.

YES

NO

Customize your advertising – permits us to offer targeted advertising to you

These cookies collect data about you based on your activities and interests in order to show you relevant ads and to track effectiveness. By collecting this data, the ads you see will be more tailored to your interests. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

YES

NO

Are you sure you want a less customized experience?

We can access your data only if you select "yes" for the categories on the previous screen. This lets us tailor our marketing so that it's more relevant for you. You can change your settings at any time by visiting our privacy statement

Your experience. Your choice.

We care about your privacy. The data we collect helps us understand how you use our products, what information you might be interested in, and what we can improve to make your engagement with Autodesk more rewarding.

May we collect and use your data to tailor your experience?

Explore the benefits of a customized experience by managing your privacy settings for this site or visit our Privacy Statement to learn more about your options.

Answer 1 · 2018-05-21T15:56:54Z

Jason Lightfoot answered May 21 2018 at 3:56 PM Jason Lightfoot commented May 21 2018 at 7:46 PM

You've used "type" with a lower 't' in the field for "step" in the list, while it should be an uppercase. But this isn't the only problem as you're using a numeric with gettablestr() it would then be looking for column 2747 etc.. If you want a single line for the field that does what you want, try:

gettablestr("Steps", value.stepRow, getrank(node(numtostring(value.Type),first(reftable("Steps")))))

· 6

Jason Lightfoot ♦♦ commented · May 21 2018 at 4:09 PM

An overloaded gettablestr and gettablenum where strings in the row and column fields are treated as headers would probably be worth having.

0 ·

Matthew Gillespie ♦♦ Jason Lightfoot ♦♦ commented · May 21 2018 at 4:38 PM

@jason.lightfoot The gettablenum and gettablestr commands are deprecated and won't be receiving any new features. You can already use row and column headers to get values from a table using the Table class:

double value = Table("Steps")["Row 3"]["Col 5"];

1 ·

Jason Lightfoot ♦♦ Matthew Gillespie ♦♦ commented · May 21 2018 at 4:55 PM

How very modern! So here's the new expression (for 17.1 and later versions):

Table("Steps")[value.stepRow][numtostring(value.Type)]

1 ·

Show more comments

Jason Lightfoot ♦♦ commented · May 21 2018 at 4:11 PM

How was it working before? Well value.type was always returning 2, so you were only getting column 2's process steps.

0 ·

question