Composite WIP Vs Time for multiple "WIP Zone"

Question

question

Raul V3 asked Jul 17 2020 at 3:32 AM Jordan Johnson commented Jul 20 2020 at 3:11 PM

Composite WIP Vs Time for multiple "WIP Zone"

Hello team,

Im doing a model where my customer want to see the composite wip vs time for more of 2 zones in one chart.

Could you please let me know how i can have more than 2 "wip zone" in one chart and how i can multiplying every item that enter/exit the wip per their "Qty" due every "item" represent different quantities in my model.

I thought to use a tracked variable and a statistic collector for WIP1 & WIP2 like example but not work like I thought.

Please see the model like reference

COMPOSITE WIP.fsm

Kind Regards.

R.V

Software Version:

FlexSim 20.1.3

flexsim 20.1.3 tracked variables stats collector composite wip

value-vs-time-trackedvariable.png (142.8 KiB)

composite-wip.fsm (62.4 KiB)

______

Cookie preferences

Your privacy is important to us and so is an optimal experience. To help us customize information and build applications, we collect data about your use of this site.

May we collect and use your data?

Learn more about the Third Party Services we use and our Privacy Statement.

Strictly necessary – required for our site to work and to provide services to you

These cookies allow us to record your preferences or login information, respond to your requests or fulfill items in your shopping cart.

YES

Improve your experience – allows us to show you what is relevant to you

These cookies enable us to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we use to deliver information and experiences tailored to you. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not be available for you.

YES

NO

Customize your advertising – permits us to offer targeted advertising to you

These cookies collect data about you based on your activities and interests in order to show you relevant ads and to track effectiveness. By collecting this data, the ads you see will be more tailored to your interests. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

YES

NO

Are you sure you want a less customized experience?

We can access your data only if you select "yes" for the categories on the previous screen. This lets us tailor our marketing so that it's more relevant for you. You can change your settings at any time by visiting our privacy statement

Your experience. Your choice.

We care about your privacy. The data we collect helps us understand how you use our products, what information you might be interested in, and what we can improve to make your engagement with Autodesk more rewarding.

May we collect and use your data to tailor your experience?

Explore the benefits of a customized experience by managing your privacy settings for this site or visit our Privacy Statement to learn more about your options.

Answer 1 · 2020-07-17T17:20:47Z

Jordan Johnson answered Jul 17 2020 at 5:20 PM Jordan Johnson commented Jul 20 2020 at 3:11 PM

I made a custom stats collector for this:

composite-wip-chart.fsm

Let me know if this was what you are looking for. The tricky part is that this stats collector uses a row label to keep track of the content for each zone. You can see that all the events finish the row. Normally, that would clear the row labels. But I checked the box to keep row labels for finished rows.

1595006043482.png (29.6 KiB)

composite-wip-chart.fsm (66.2 KiB)

· 2

Raul V3 commented · Jul 17 2020 at 11:15 PM

Hi ,

Yes it does, thanks a lot but if I use the stats collector above, I don't need to use the tracked variable from the object "WIP1" and "WIP2" called "labelname", right?

thx

R.V

0 ·

Jordan Johnson ♦♦ Raul V3 commented · Jul 20 2020 at 3:11 PM

Correct, the stats collector can track all the data it needs without using a tracked variable. I can listen to the correct events, and it can increment and decrement a value with those events, which is what the WIP1 and WIP2 objects were doing.

1 ·

question