Simulate different number of operators without experimenter

Question

question

Jonathan asked Oct 22 2020 at 8:47 PM Jason Lightfoot commented Nov 03 2023 at 11:35 AM

Simulate different number of operators without experimenter

My model is a conveyor with 4 stations on top. Each stations center is to its own operator.

The process times for my flow items are pulled from a global table. The process times are different depending on how many operators are working and what part type they are working on.

What I would like is to use a table or something similar to choose the number of operators that are working. Without using experimenter as this is for a particular presentation.

The scenarios are 2, 3, or 4 operators. I would also like if the unused operator (and possibly station) could be hidden as well.

My current, working, way of doing this is having all three scenarios built in 3 separate parts of my build space and running from the same schedule simultaneously, which has its own pro's and con's. The main drawbacks are my computer specs.

I am to eventually model a large portion of our plant with this model included to help us determine process flow and scheduling, so I can't keep using the 3 separate models.

I have only recently completed the core training course so please be descriptive and ask questions if I am not clear. Thank you.

I am unable to share my model file. Apologies in advance.

Software Version:

FlexSim 20.2.3

flexsim 20.2.3 multiple operators stations scenarios

· 2

______

Cookie preferences

Your privacy is important to us and so is an optimal experience. To help us customize information and build applications, we collect data about your use of this site.

May we collect and use your data?

Learn more about the Third Party Services we use and our Privacy Statement.

Strictly necessary – required for our site to work and to provide services to you

These cookies allow us to record your preferences or login information, respond to your requests or fulfill items in your shopping cart.

YES

Improve your experience – allows us to show you what is relevant to you

These cookies enable us to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we use to deliver information and experiences tailored to you. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not be available for you.

YES

NO

Customize your advertising – permits us to offer targeted advertising to you

These cookies collect data about you based on your activities and interests in order to show you relevant ads and to track effectiveness. By collecting this data, the ads you see will be more tailored to your interests. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

YES

NO

Are you sure you want a less customized experience?

We can access your data only if you select "yes" for the categories on the previous screen. This lets us tailor our marketing so that it's more relevant for you. You can change your settings at any time by visiting our privacy statement

Your experience. Your choice.

We care about your privacy. The data we collect helps us understand how you use our products, what information you might be interested in, and what we can improve to make your engagement with Autodesk more rewarding.

May we collect and use your data to tailor your experience?

Explore the benefits of a customized experience by managing your privacy settings for this site or visit our Privacy Statement to learn more about your options.

Answer 1 · 2020-10-23T06:47:49Z

Aida Chaikh answered Oct 23 2020 at 6:47 AM Jonathan commented Oct 28 2020 at 2:45 PM

Hello @Jonathan S3,

I have attached a model with 2 processors and a global table. In this global table there are processor's time and num of operators that each processor needs. To change the number of operator there is a code in the user events that it changes this value in the instant 0 of the simulation.

I hope it helps!

example-differentnumoperators.fsm (68.1 KiB)

1603435303409.png (142.8 KiB)

· 1

Jonathan commented · Oct 28 2020 at 2:45 PM

Thank you. This wasn't exactly what I was looking for but it did help me figure out a way to do what I needed. So you didn't give me what I wanted but you gave me what I needed, which was a bit more helpful in the end!

I needed to be able to turn a station on a conveyor and its associated operator essentially on or off, and allow product to flow across that section of conveyor as if the station and operator weren't there.

What I ended up doing was writing a switch statement for the stations to "return 0" for their 'Process Condition - Always Process' statement if I set a value to 0 in a global table. I also added this code to the 'Use Operator' value so the assigned operator wouldn't walk over there on arrival.

Currently the operators on arrival start animation still triggers but the operator doesn't travel to the station and the flow item moves across the station as if it weren't there. This enables my dashboard throughput statistics to accurately reflect my number of active stations and total line throughput, and I will be able to set this table value in experimenter to run my different scenarios.

Here's my switch statement to return a global table cell value for the stations Process Condition - Always Process statement for others reference:

To explain:

Global table "ProgressiveScenario" is [1][1] and I put 2, 3, or 4 based on how many stations I want operational.

The switch statement sets a value, offset, based on that case and returns a cell value in another global table called "BuilderTimes" which is either 0 or 1.

BuilderTimes also lists my process times for each station dependent on which operator scenario I'm running and which part type they're working on.

To get process times I have a similar switch statement in process time and it returns that table value as the mean value of a statistical distribution statement. This way I get a bit of variance as operators are not robots so they do things a little different every time.

0 ·

1603895640127.png (25.7 KiB)

question