Why does the pull from the transport resource not work?

Question

question

Diego V12 asked Mar 18, '20 Diego V12 commented Mar 18, '20

Why does the pull from the transport resource not work?

Good morning!

Hereby I have model where two situations that from my point of view should lead to the same result do not.

I would like to transfer a transport resource from a first operator to a second one. I have been able to do such thing with a list but for some reason when I use the "Acquire Transport" form the people module, something is blocking the process from working. I have tried to modify the logic but without succeeding.

I attach here the model concerned by this question. Is there something I might be missing from the people module or there is no solution for such issue but "adquiring-releasing" for each resource.

release-ressource-problem.fsm

Thank you very much and have a good day!

Software Version:

FlexSim 19.2.4

process flow people module pull item transport equipment

release-ressource-problem.fsm (77.8 KiB)

5 |100000

Attachments: Up to 12 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 23.8 MiB each and 47.7 MiB total.

Answer 1 · 2020-03-18T17:32:44Z

Matthew Gillespie answered Mar 18, '20 Diego V12 commented Mar 18, '20

Releasing a resource from a different token can be a little bit tricky. I made some changes to the Create Tokens activity in the With Transport Resource container.

It now creates a child token with label access on parent only and I got rid of the label you were adding to the new token. This makes it so that the child token is basically a proxy for the parent token and it uses the parent's labels instead of looking for labels on the child token.

releaseresourcedifferenttoken.fsm

createtokenschanges.png (8.5 KiB)

releaseresourcedifferenttoken.fsm (77.6 KiB)

· 1

5 |100000

Attachments: Up to 12 attachments (including images) can be used with a maximum of 23.8 MiB each and 47.7 MiB total.

Diego V12 commented · Mar 18, 2020 at 05:35 PM

Thank you very much Matthew!!

0 ·

question