SPT rule without list

Question

question

Ömer Faruk Y asked Jul 17 2021 at 1:33 PM Eric M edited Jul 21 2021 at 6:43 PM

SPT rule without list

Assamble Problem with SPT.fsmI have a workshop. This workshop has a 6 machine(A, B, C, D, E and Packaging). 3 different item produced in this place (X,Y and Z) than assamble each other.

X produced A machine,

Y produced B machine,

Z produced C machine,

(2 X + Y) = XY assemble on D machine,

(XY+Z) = XYZ assemble on E machine,

Than XYZ item sent Quality control. Quality control sent 3% is sent to scrap, 17% to machine E and 80% to packaging.

İtem X arrival time exp(0,5), Y arrival time (0,4), Z arrival time exp(0,9)

A machine process time normal (5,1), B machine process time uniform (7,11), C machine process time triangular (3.5, 4, 6), D machine process time normal (10,0.5), E machine process time uniform(8,11), packaging process time triangular(9,10,11).

I did but I m not sure. I haven’t any list. I want to give priority to the job with the shortest processing time (SPT rule). How can I express this on FlexSim.

Assamble Problem with SPT.fsm

Software Version:

FlexSim 21.1.4

spt spt rule without list

assamble-problem-with-spt.fsm (32.5 KiB)

______

Cookie preferences

Your privacy is important to us and so is an optimal experience. To help us customize information and build applications, we collect data about your use of this site.

May we collect and use your data?

Learn more about the Third Party Services we use and our Privacy Statement.

Strictly necessary – required for our site to work and to provide services to you

These cookies allow us to record your preferences or login information, respond to your requests or fulfill items in your shopping cart.

YES

Improve your experience – allows us to show you what is relevant to you

These cookies enable us to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we use to deliver information and experiences tailored to you. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not be available for you.

YES

NO

Customize your advertising – permits us to offer targeted advertising to you

These cookies collect data about you based on your activities and interests in order to show you relevant ads and to track effectiveness. By collecting this data, the ads you see will be more tailored to your interests. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

YES

NO

Are you sure you want a less customized experience?

We can access your data only if you select "yes" for the categories on the previous screen. This lets us tailor our marketing so that it's more relevant for you. You can change your settings at any time by visiting our privacy statement

Your experience. Your choice.

We care about your privacy. The data we collect helps us understand how you use our products, what information you might be interested in, and what we can improve to make your engagement with Autodesk more rewarding.

May we collect and use your data to tailor your experience?

Explore the benefits of a customized experience by managing your privacy settings for this site or visit our Privacy Statement to learn more about your options.

Answer 1 · 2021-07-19T17:18:26Z

Eric M answered Jul 19 2021 at 5:18 PM Eric M edited Jul 21 2021 at 6:43 PM

Hi @Ömer Faruk Y if I'm understanding correctly, you want the "Re processing E" processor to prioritize items that have a shorter processing time, right? If this is the case, you will need to come up with logic that actually differentiates the processing time (probably a label on each item). Right now it looks like your processor is reading a value off GlobalTable1 which will always be the same ("X"). So it doesn't really make sense in your process time to have the cases 5 or 6 with different processing times when that value is always "X" (never 5 or 6).

With that said, I would assign a label on the item depending on what process time it should be. Then in the processor input settings I would check the box "pull strategy" and choose "pull best item" in the dropdown. Then you can specify which label value to maximize or minimize.

1626714300469.png (12.1 KiB)

1626714966122.png (9.1 KiB)

· 2

Ömer Faruk Y commented · Jul 21 2021 at 5:42 PM

Actually no.I want to apply the SPT priority rule on queued jobs on machines A,B,C,D and E. Is it possible ? Also these labels (5 and 6) are for products (17%) that come from quality control to machine E for reprocessing.

0 ·

Eric M Ömer Faruk Y commented · Jul 21 2021 at 6:43 PM

In that case, instead of assigning the process time in the processors / combiners, I would assign the time to a label on the item itself. Otherwise the processor won't know how long an item will take until it actually enters the processor. You can then use the method above on each machine to pull the item with the shortest processing time.

You probably want 1 label for each machine the item will go through. So "X" items should have a time label for A machine and D machine. I would assign another time for E machine on the XY_2X_Y queue on entry. Then on each machine, instead of a process time have a label reference. Something like item.DmachineTime (or whatever else you want to name it).

As far as the 5 and 6, I'm not seeing where they're assigned (and either way, the table reference in the Value field will only ever return "X" since that's what's in the table). I would use the same method as above and just assign those items a new time as a label for when they go back through "Re processing E."

0 ·

question