AGV won’t finish the travel task

Question

question

Patrick Zweekhorst asked Feb 23 2022 at 2:37 PM Bo.W commented Apr 04 2023 at 2:55 AM

AGV won’t finish the travel task

Hi,

We have found an issue in the AGV network. When we have checked the option Divide by Speed (in the route cost option) the AGV won’t arrive at any control point when it is loaded:

To create this situation, we needed the AGV the have loaded an item and different speeds for loaded vs unloaded. Why does the AGV no longer arrive at the location?

Thank you in advance

Patrick

DivideBySpeed_1.fsm

Software Version:

FlexSim 22.0.1

agv travel task route cost

1645627085041.png (63.0 KiB)

dividebyspeed-1.fsm (40.9 KiB)

· 2

Omar Aguilera Rico commented · Feb 23 2022 at 4:07 PM

Hello @Patrick Zweekhorst , I opened your representative model of the situation. I ran it and the AGV arrives at the ControlPoint (ControlPoint3), loads a box and goes to the last ControlPoint (ControlPoint2) of the route.

I tried changing the speed from 1.5 to 3, it actually follows one of the routes that you have represented. The model complies with the movements indicated in ProcessFlow.

Can you send a GIF of what is happening to you?

0 ·

Jason Lightfoot ♦♦ Omar Aguilera Rico commented · Feb 23 2022 at 4:55 PM

The process flow token does not complete the travel task and the task executer is still actively travelling with an incomplete active task sequence. I've marked this for further investigation and suggested the developers take a look. The code is within the AGV module dll.

1 ·

______

Cookie preferences

Your privacy is important to us and so is an optimal experience. To help us customize information and build applications, we collect data about your use of this site.

May we collect and use your data?

Learn more about the Third Party Services we use and our Privacy Statement.

Strictly necessary – required for our site to work and to provide services to you

These cookies allow us to record your preferences or login information, respond to your requests or fulfill items in your shopping cart.

YES

Improve your experience – allows us to show you what is relevant to you

These cookies enable us to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we use to deliver information and experiences tailored to you. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not be available for you.

YES

NO

Customize your advertising – permits us to offer targeted advertising to you

These cookies collect data about you based on your activities and interests in order to show you relevant ads and to track effectiveness. By collecting this data, the ads you see will be more tailored to your interests. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

YES

NO

Are you sure you want a less customized experience?

We can access your data only if you select "yes" for the categories on the previous screen. This lets us tailor our marketing so that it's more relevant for you. You can change your settings at any time by visiting our privacy statement

Your experience. Your choice.

We care about your privacy. The data we collect helps us understand how you use our products, what information you might be interested in, and what we can improve to make your engagement with Autodesk more rewarding.

May we collect and use your data to tailor your experience?

Explore the benefits of a customized experience by managing your privacy settings for this site or visit our Privacy Statement to learn more about your options.

Answer 1 · 2022-02-28T20:57:27Z

Jordan Johnson answered Feb 28 2022 at 8:57 PM Bo.W commented Apr 04 2023 at 2:55 AM

This seems like a bug to me. I played with it a little more, and it seems like the problem occurs if the "divide by speed" box is checked, and if the loaded speed is different from the empty speed. I'll add it to the dev list.

· 3

Bo.W commented · Apr 03 2023 at 7:59 AM

Has this bug been fixed in this version？

0 ·

Jason Lightfoot ♦♦ Bo.W commented · Apr 03 2023 at 12:59 PM

The behavior in 23.0.6 is now correct, but not in 22.0.15.

0 ·

Bo.W Jason Lightfoot ♦♦ commented · Apr 04 2023 at 2:55 AM

OK，thanks

0 ·

question