Problems With Delete Transporters

Question

question

DaniCor asked Jan 08 2024 at 2:54 PM DaniCor commented Jan 17 2024 at 9:35 PM

Problems With Delete Transporters

SIMULATION WITHOUT TRANSPORTER.fsm SIMULATION WITH TRANSPORTER.fsm

Hi community

I have a problem, I've deleted the transporters of my simulation and now shows me an error with the dispatcher but I never conected with the dispatcher, on the other hand I unpinned the option use transport for the output of my queue "ALMACEN"

The first pic shows the normal working of the simulation with transporter

The second pic shows the error when I deleted the transporter

Software Version:

FlexSim 24.0.0

transporter ports outport

normal-working-with-transporter.png (300.7 KiB)

without-transporter-error.png (293.2 KiB)

simulation-without-transporter.fsm (52.7 KiB)

simulation-with-transporter.fsm (59.9 KiB)

· 1

______

Cookie preferences

Your privacy is important to us and so is an optimal experience. To help us customize information and build applications, we collect data about your use of this site.

May we collect and use your data?

Learn more about the Third Party Services we use and our Privacy Statement.

Strictly necessary – required for our site to work and to provide services to you

These cookies allow us to record your preferences or login information, respond to your requests or fulfill items in your shopping cart.

YES

Improve your experience – allows us to show you what is relevant to you

These cookies enable us to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we use to deliver information and experiences tailored to you. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not be available for you.

YES

NO

Customize your advertising – permits us to offer targeted advertising to you

These cookies collect data about you based on your activities and interests in order to show you relevant ads and to track effectiveness. By collecting this data, the ads you see will be more tailored to your interests. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

YES

NO

Are you sure you want a less customized experience?

We can access your data only if you select "yes" for the categories on the previous screen. This lets us tailor our marketing so that it's more relevant for you. You can change your settings at any time by visiting our privacy statement

Your experience. Your choice.

We care about your privacy. The data we collect helps us understand how you use our products, what information you might be interested in, and what we can improve to make your engagement with Autodesk more rewarding.

May we collect and use your data to tailor your experience?

Explore the benefits of a customized experience by managing your privacy settings for this site or visit our Privacy Statement to learn more about your options.

Answer 1 · 2024-01-08T17:26:36Z

Julio R answered Jan 08 2024 at 5:26 PM DaniCor commented Jan 17 2024 at 9:35 PM

your last processor "ENVASADO" is trying to use the central port 2 for transport but does not have a second conexion.

You just need to change that 2 int a 1 and the problem should be fixed.

1704734695151.png (36.5 KiB)

· 4

DaniCor commented · Jan 08 2024 at 11:34 PM

Hi mates

Thanks a lot for the support now it works well but my curiosity now it's. Why the simulation doesn't run since the beggining like the program with transporter(afterwards some time currently the processor make outputs but suddenly from 0 units of output to 600 units. As you can see in the pic

The program with transporter ass you can see in the first question work normal since the beginning according the process time of my procesor

SIMULATION WITH TRANSPORTER.fsm

SIMULATION WITHOUT TRANSPORTERv2.fsm

Best regards!

0 ·

tweak-simulation-without-transporter.png (314.0 KiB)

simulation-with-transporter.fsm (59.9 KiB)

simulation-without-transporterv2.fsm (52.2 KiB)

Julio R DaniCor commented · Jan 09 2024 at 2:38 AM

Hola @DaniCor ,

no entiendo muy bien estos últimos comentarios. Veo que en ambos modelos corren hasta que se procesan todos los items.

Si la pregunta es por qué uno tarda más que el otro, tu modelo está lleno de miles de eventos muy rápidos con muchos items, esto se podría solucionar de forma sencilla con estratégias como eliminar los mansajes del queue inicial y sustituirlos por un source, reducir el número de items en el queue inicial creando solo un consolidado como un item individual que luego se divida en un separator o cualquier otra estratégia que reduzca el número de eventos o el número de items que están en tu modelo simultáneamente sin afectar a las estadísticas de salida.

Saludos

0 ·

DaniCor Julio R commented · Jan 09 2024 at 4:20 AM

Hola Julio

Correcto corren los dos modelos, pero en el modelo con sin transporters, no se ve un flujo normal del processor1, de la nada de cantidad de output 0 aparece output 700, y eso varia los datos de tiempo de funcionamiento. En cambio en el modelo con transporter desde el inicio de la simulación de ve salidas del output del processor linealmente

Gracias por la ayuda

0 ·

Show more comments

Answer 2 · 2024-01-08T17:25:52Z

Kavika F answered Jan 08 2024 at 5:25 PM

Hey @DaniCor, one reason you're getting "Array Index Out of Bounds" errors on the processor ENVASADO is because it's using center-port connection 2 when there's only 1 center-port connection available.

It seems to work fine after you change ENVASADO to use

current.centerObjects[1]

instead.

1704734587564.png (17.1 KiB)

question