Process Flow Move Object vs Closed Input Port: Tokens Are Not Held

Question

question

Gui Vaccaro asked Mar 01 2025 at 10:39 PM Joerg Vogel commented Mar 06 2025 at 8:21 AM

Process Flow Move Object vs Closed Input Port: Tokens Are Not Held

Hello,

Please see the attached model. It mimics a behavior I want to confirm: when objects are sent to an entry transfer via a "Move Object" activity, the state of the destination's input port does not matter. I.e., even if the input ports are closed, the move object will still send the objects instead of holding the tokens until the ports are re-open.

One can hold the tokens using a resource, etc. etc. but this creates a disconnect between the 3d objects and the process flows.

Is this an intended behavior (if so, what application justifies it?) or something to be improved?

Thank you for the clarification.

Move Object vs Closed Port Problem.fsm

Software Version:

FlexSim 25.0.2

processs flow connections input port move object

move-object-vs-closed-port-problem.fsm (74.1 KiB)

· 4

Joerg Vogel commented · Mar 02 2025 at 9:02 AM

@Gui Vaccaro, I have been skeptical when Process Flow has been introduced to FlexSim environment. You can stay with 3D Flow Logic then you play by defined rules or you build a logic in Process Flow on your own, but then you are completely responsible for your model: statistics, item flow, dependencies. A 3D model is then more an animation rather than a logic structure. And there are some construction sites that must be still integrated into process flow to control some modules by API. You can see this in conveyor module to pass an item wherever you want it onto a conveyor or let it exit this scope. The legacy fixed resource conveyor has this ability for straight sections.

0 ·

Joerg Vogel commented · Mar 02 2025 at 4:35 PM

@Gui Vaccaro, you can close the input, but not an input port. Closing an input port is restricted to fluid objects. Please refer to reference command manual.

0 ·

Gui Vaccaro Joerg Vogel commented · Mar 05 2025 at 9:23 PM

@Joerg Vogel ,

I could not understand your comment above. I am using Object.input.close() as indicated here:

Thank you.

0 ·

1741209787463.png (29.0 KiB)

Joerg Vogel Gui Vaccaro commented · Mar 06 2025 at 8:21 AM

@Gui Vaccaro, your wrote "Closed Input Port". There is small difference between closing an input and closing an input port. The comment was for the later statement, which you haven't used.

0 ·

______

Cookie preferences

Your privacy is important to us and so is an optimal experience. To help us customize information and build applications, we collect data about your use of this site.

May we collect and use your data?

Learn more about the Third Party Services we use and our Privacy Statement.

Strictly necessary – required for our site to work and to provide services to you

These cookies allow us to record your preferences or login information, respond to your requests or fulfill items in your shopping cart.

YES

Improve your experience – allows us to show you what is relevant to you

These cookies enable us to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we use to deliver information and experiences tailored to you. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not be available for you.

YES

NO

Customize your advertising – permits us to offer targeted advertising to you

These cookies collect data about you based on your activities and interests in order to show you relevant ads and to track effectiveness. By collecting this data, the ads you see will be more tailored to your interests. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

YES

NO

Are you sure you want a less customized experience?

We can access your data only if you select "yes" for the categories on the previous screen. This lets us tailor our marketing so that it's more relevant for you. You can change your settings at any time by visiting our privacy statement

Your experience. Your choice.

We care about your privacy. The data we collect helps us understand how you use our products, what information you might be interested in, and what we can improve to make your engagement with Autodesk more rewarding.

May we collect and use your data to tailor your experience?

Explore the benefits of a customized experience by managing your privacy settings for this site or visit our Privacy Statement to learn more about your options.

Answer 1 · 2025-03-02T08:41:51Z

Joerg Vogel answered Mar 02 2025 at 8:41 AM Joerg Vogel edited Mar 02 2025 at 4:36 PM

Yes, it is.

You can bypass Send To 3D logic mechanism easily by moveobject or by an unload or fixed resource unload task.
There is a 3D logic Flow Chart for a standard Fixed Resource flow mechanism. You can mimic this fully in Process Flow, but you can still bypass it. That is Process Flow benefit to build a logic completely independent from 3D default flow mechanism.

Edit:

A default structure would consist of releaseitem. Act on Send To Port to check if a destinations port is available. Move item if port is available by receiveitem otherwise don’t move it.

question