Create AVG routes with loops in Process Flow using Resources or Lists

Question

question

Borja Lorenzo asked Jan 29 2025 at 3:54 PM Borja Lorenzo edited Feb 01 2025 at 11:45 PM

Create AVG routes with loops in Process Flow using Resources or Lists

Hello,

I have a simplified model that I am working on. I am assigning stop logics to the AMR TaskExecuter 3 so that it goes to the nodes and waits there for a while. The source is activated based on a calendar.

The problem I am having is that when I make the loop after the Delay, the label in the first Acquire of DeliveryPoint is of type node... but when it acquires the next node, it converts it to an Array, and I have problems with the variable types to read the data.

Could an Array be created in the Acquire of DeliveryPoint Assign to Label? I don't see the option in the contextual menu.

I think this is the problem, but I'm not 100% sure.

I have also worked on the idea with a list. I want the loop to end when the available nodes are exhausted, to provide the output both in the pull activity and in the Acquire. But in the Resource method, I only return the last acquired one, not all of them in the array. In the list method, I get an error in the activity of moving to the sink... but not all of them are returned either. I can't push it when I've already used them because it wouldn't allow me to output when it has gone through all of them. I want to set up the loop to avoid having to repeat activities

Thank you in advance for your comments.

simplificacion-control-area-in-astar-1_4.fsm

Software Version:

FlexSim 24.1.1

agv network nodes acquire resource label array looping

simplificacion-control-area-in-astar-1-4.fsm (89.9 KiB)

______

Cookie preferences

Your privacy is important to us and so is an optimal experience. To help us customize information and build applications, we collect data about your use of this site.

May we collect and use your data?

Learn more about the Third Party Services we use and our Privacy Statement.

Strictly necessary – required for our site to work and to provide services to you

These cookies allow us to record your preferences or login information, respond to your requests or fulfill items in your shopping cart.

YES

Improve your experience – allows us to show you what is relevant to you

These cookies enable us to provide enhanced functionality and personalization. They may be set by us or by third party providers whose services we use to deliver information and experiences tailored to you. If you do not allow these cookies, some or all of these services may not be available for you.

YES

NO

Customize your advertising – permits us to offer targeted advertising to you

These cookies collect data about you based on your activities and interests in order to show you relevant ads and to track effectiveness. By collecting this data, the ads you see will be more tailored to your interests. If you do not allow these cookies, you will experience less targeted advertising.

YES

NO

Are you sure you want a less customized experience?

We can access your data only if you select "yes" for the categories on the previous screen. This lets us tailor our marketing so that it's more relevant for you. You can change your settings at any time by visiting our privacy statement

Your experience. Your choice.

We care about your privacy. The data we collect helps us understand how you use our products, what information you might be interested in, and what we can improve to make your engagement with Autodesk more rewarding.

May we collect and use your data to tailor your experience?

Explore the benefits of a customized experience by managing your privacy settings for this site or visit our Privacy Statement to learn more about your options.

Answer 1 · 2025-01-30T07:20:29Z

Felix Möhlmann answered Jan 30 2025 at 7:20 AM Borja Lorenzo edited Feb 01 2025 at 11:45 PM

If you create the label that a resource gets assigned with an empty array as the value, the label will stay as an array when acquiring resources.

To return all resources assigned to an array label, choose the "Release All" option in the Release activity.

You are currently pushing the token to the list after the loop ends. You should instead be assigning all pulled networks nodes to an array label and then push that array back.

In both cases, resource and list, new elements get added to the front of the array. So you would "token.PuntoEntrega[1]" to refer to the newest point. This also means that before returning/pushing the values, the arrays need to be reversed or the network nodes will be acquired/pulled in the wrong order in the next loop.

With all that said, this approach is only useful when there are more than one vehicle doing the loop and only one should stop at each station. In that case you could use a batch activity to wait until all vehicles have finished the loop before refilling the list.

With only one, I would just use a Run Sub Flow activity to visit each NN in order.

simplificacion-control-area-in-astar-1-5.fsm

1738221067679.png (1.6 KiB)

1738221163600.png (4.3 KiB)

simplificacion-control-area-in-astar-1-5.fsm (87.3 KiB)

· 1

Borja Lorenzo commented · Feb 01 2025 at 10:39 PM

Hello Felix,

Sorry for the delay in responding. I wanted to review and study the recommendations. I proposed the RunSubFlow solution after posting the question, and after your confirmation, I decided to go with that method. However, I found it very interesting to study and internalize the solutions of Resources and Lists. Your suggestions work perfectly.

I would like to point out and add that:

In both methods, despite reversing the order of the Array before pushing the values to the Resources or List, the order in which they entered was not sufficient for the new reassignment to be progressive, as the second train would take the second value pushed by the first train. In this scenario, delivery point 1 was not assigned first because it was 3rd in the Resources list. To solve this, I created an expression in the case of Resources, and in the case of the list, I added a new field to the Decision Point group (parallel solution) to identify each queue with a number and use it as a sorting criterion in the extraction.

I am sharing the simplified model, in case it can help someone else as it helped me to better understand how the properties of these Process Flow activities work.

Added to this model is another simplified example of control areas. This point is addressed in another published question, for which I leave the link: Area Control in Astar with Label Filtering - FlexSim Community
Thank you very much for your help, Felix.
simplificacion-control-area-in-astar-flujos loops Resources_List_RunSubFlow 20250131_7.fsm

0 ·

simplificacion-control-area-in-astar-flujos-loops.fsm (100.1 KiB)

question